H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Mara Santangelo H2H: 1-1
Sania Mirza and Mara Santangelo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mara Santangelo leads 1–0 on grass, while Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mara Santangelo won the 2007 Birmingham third round 6-3 3-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2007* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Mara Santangelo | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2007* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 7-6(4) | Mara Santangelo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Mara Santangelo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |