H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 1-4

Sabine Lisicki holds a 4–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sabine Lisicki leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2015 Miami fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Sabine Lisicki
GER Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sabine Lisicki #21 6-1 6-2 Sara Errani #13 Match data
Mar 12, 2015* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sabine Lisicki #30 6-4 6-2 Sara Errani #12 Match data
Aug 14, 2014* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sabine Lisicki #29 6-4 2-6 7-6(2) Sara Errani #15 Match data
Aug 6, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sabine Lisicki #29 6-1 7-5 Sara Errani #15 Match data
Jun 2, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Sara Errani #5 6-0 6-4 Sabine Lisicki #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,940 206 172 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Sabine Lisicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,606 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,792 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,658 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,872 0 3
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2012 15–18 45.5% #37 1,707 0 3
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,824 0 3
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,798 0 4
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,791 0 4
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2016 14–19 42.4% #93 1,647 0 4
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2017 3–4 42.9% #220 1,636 0 4
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,549 0 4
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,479 0 4
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,575 0 4
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,569 0 4
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —