H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Clara Burel H2H: 3-0
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 3–0 lead over Clara Burel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2023 Palermo quarterfinal 6-1 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2023 | Cleveland | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Clara Burel | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2023* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-1 7-6(6) | Clara Burel | Match data |
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 7-6(0) 6-2 | Clara Burel | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2022* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 6-2 | Clara Burel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Clara Burel | #429 | #42 | 1,311 | 1,803 | 53 | 64 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Clara Burel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #778 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #236 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #122 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #55 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #429 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |