H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 0-1
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Saisai Zheng | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |