H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sesil Karatantcheva vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-0
Sesil Karatantcheva holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sesil Karatantcheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sesil Karatantcheva won the 2004 Vancouver fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004* | Vancouver | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sesil Karatantcheva | 7-5 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sesil Karatantcheva | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |