H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sesil Karatantcheva vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 1-1
Sesil Karatantcheva and Maria Elena Camerin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2009 Portoroz third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2009* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-1 6-4 | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2005* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sesil Karatantcheva | 6-2 6-4 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sesil Karatantcheva | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |