H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sesil Karatantcheva vs Melinda Czink H2H: 0-1

Melinda Czink holds a 1–0 lead over Sesil Karatantcheva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2012 San Diego round of 32 6-2 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sesil Karatantcheva
Bulgaria Age 37 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Melinda Czink #94 6-2 4-6 7-5 Sesil Karatantcheva #105 Match data Jul 19, 2012* R32 San Diego Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sesil Karatantcheva #1,329 #35 919 1,728 50 75 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sesil Karatantcheva Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2004 7–5 58.3% #133 1,564 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2005 17–14 54.8% #39 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 1–1 50.0% #148 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 2–6 25.0% #132 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 7–8 46.7% #140 1,623 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2011 0–1 0.0% #139 1,616 0 0 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2012 4–12 25.0% #110 1,537 0 0 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 2013 3–9 25.0% #141 1,519 0 0 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2014 2–3 40.0% #178 1,520 0 0 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2015 7–11 38.9% #112 1,519 0 0 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2016 0–2 0.0% #211 1,533 0 0 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2017 0–1 0.0% #182 1,517 0 0 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1
28 2018 0–2 0.0% #229 1,481 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sesil Karatantcheva Melinda Czink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2004 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 11 11 22 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 36 47 83 43.4% 8 21 29 27.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/125 of Sesil Karatantcheva's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sesil Karatantcheva Melinda Czink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2004 1/12 2.0 3.0 46.8% 45.5% 40.0% 37.5% 0.0% 42.6% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 10/31 1.5 4.7 60.6% 56.4% 37.3% 37.0% 41.2% 48.4% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 2/2 1.5 3.0 63.8% 62.4% 50.7% 58.9% 52.1% 58.9% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 7/8 1.1 3.6 67.5% 49.8% 38.9% 40.1% 52.5% 46.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 15/15 1.4 3.8 67.8% 57.8% 43.1% 52.5% 44.7% 52.9% 44.5% 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9%
21 2011 1/1 0.0 3.0 63.3% 50.0% 40.9% 0.0% 50.0% 46.7% 43.1% 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0%
22 2012 14/16 1.4 7.1 64.9% 58.2% 41.0% 49.1% 49.2% 52.2% 50.6% 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6%
23 2013 9/12 1.2 9.1 54.1% 59.2% 33.8% 50.4% 49.6% 47.3% 43.4% 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5%
24 2014 4/5 2.8 7.0 59.4% 60.9% 48.0% 51.9% 33.1% 55.6% 43.1% 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3%
25 2015 16/18 1.7 6.3 69.1% 59.4% 42.2% 44.4% 57.1% 55.1% 40.5% 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5%
26 2016 2/2 0.5 8.0 56.7% 58.1% 31.6% 45.1% 46.4% 46.7% 45.6% 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7%
27 2017 1/1 1.0 3.0 61.7% 48.3% 22.2% 14.3% 50.0% 38.3% 38.1% 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0%
28 2018 2/2 0.5 7.0 56.5% 51.6% 31.8% 40.2% 100.0% 42.2% 27.6% 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9%
Career — 84/125 1.4 5.8 63.8% 57.2% 40.1% 45.7% 49.2% 51.0% 43.6% — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sesil Karatantcheva Melinda Czink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1565 113.8 -1.46 -1.14 0.456 34.8% +15 — — 58.6% +0.17 2–3 (40%) — — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1703 132.7 -2.96 -0.17 0.824 45.4% -35 -71 — 50.7% -0.42 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 106.7 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1693 108.3 +0.98 +0.45 1.142 52.4% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1606 97.6 -3.63 -1.61 0.797 44.9% +4 — — 30.0% -1.50 2–2 (50%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1624 115.1 -1.13 +0.73 0.945 48.6% -5 -67 +51 44.1% -0.47 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.47 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33
21 2011 1617 102.8 -0.42 +1.48 0.807 44.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.35 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
22 2012 1538 120.4 -2.60 +3.93 1.059 51.3% +2 +1 — 38.5% -0.51 0–7 (0%) 0–1 — 0.00 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54
23 2013 1520 122.0 -2.96 +1.39 0.822 45.5% +2 +5 — 30.8% -1.19 0–2 0–2 — -0.98 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02
24 2014 1520 100.7 -1.01 -0.55 0.970 48.8% +13 — — 38.5% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.15 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11
25 2015 1520 112.6 -2.56 -0.62 0.903 48.1% +51 -21 — 41.0% -1.08 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.21 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10
26 2016 1533 112.6 -1.59 -0.25 0.855 46.1% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.01 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55
27 2017 1518 96.5 -0.89 +0.34 0.617 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52
28 2018 1482 97.3 -1.10 -2.31 0.478 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.09 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11
29 2019 1442 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51
33 2023 1411 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1728 121.3 -2.22 +0.59 0.890 47.3% 0 -29 +51 42.3% -0.75 18–23 (44%) 7–9 (44%) 94.4 -1.50 — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.