H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2008 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Shahar Peer | 6-3 7-5 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shahar Peer | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |