H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 0-4

Sabine Lisicki holds a 4–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sabine Lisicki leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2016 Guangzhou fourth round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Sabine Lisicki
GER Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 2016* Guangzhou WTA 250 R16 Hard Sabine Lisicki #113 6-4 6-1 Shuai Peng #244 Match data
Mar 22, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sabine Lisicki #13 6-4 7-5 Shuai Peng #23 Match data
Jun 11, 2011* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Sabine Lisicki #100 6-3 6-1 Shuai Peng #20 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Tashkent WTA 250 SF Hard Sabine Lisicki #64 5-7 6-3 6-4 Shuai Peng #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,940 206 172 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Sabine Lisicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,606 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,792 0 1
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,658 0 1
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,872 0 3
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2012 15–18 45.5% #37 1,707 0 3
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,824 0 3
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,798 0 4
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,791 0 4
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2016 14–19 42.4% #93 1,647 0 4
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2017 3–4 42.9% #220 1,636 0 4
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,549 0 4
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,479 0 4
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,575 0 4
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,569 0 4
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —