H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 1-1
Shuai Zhang and Aleksandra Wozniak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2014 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-1 6-4 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-3 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |