H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 1-4
Andrea Petkovic holds a 4–1 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2021 Miami first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 7-5 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 7-5 6-4 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2019* | New York | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Petkovic | 6-3 6-4 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| May 20, 2011* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-1 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |