H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 1-2
Angelique Kerber holds a 2–1 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2019 Beijing second round 6-2 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-1 2-6 6-0 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-4 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |