H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands H2H: 2-0
Shuai Zhang holds a 2–0 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuai Zhang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2021 Cleveland fourth round 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2025 | Charleston | WTA 500 | Q2 | Clay | Shuai Zhang | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2021* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-4 7-6(7) | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2016* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-3 7-5 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |