H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 1-0

Shuai Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Zhang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2015 Nuremberg round of 32 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
SRB Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Zhang #126 6-1 7-5 Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #60 Match data May 21, 2015* R32 Nuremberg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic #546 #32 1,485 1,735 97 125 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 2010 6–12 33.3% #80 1,530 0 0
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2011 14–26 35.0% #73 1,547 0 0
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 2012 17–17 50.0% #56 1,617 0 1
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 2013 23–18 56.1% #36 1,725 0 2
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 2014 20–26 43.5% #57 1,614 0 2
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 2015 17–21 44.7% #79 1,619 0 2
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2016 0–4 0.0% #725 1,555 0 2
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% #546 1,517 0 2
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 11 19 30 36.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 16 16 32 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 13 14 27 48.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — — — — — 76 85 161 47.2% 12 24 36 33.3% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 199/222 of Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% 2010 17/18 1.3 2.6 65.7% 56.8% 37.9% 47.3% 48.4% 50.8% 41.4%
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% 2011 39/40 1.8 3.2 65.6% 58.8% 42.3% 49.4% 43.9% 53.2% 43.1%
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% 2012 31/34 1.7 4.1 64.2% 58.4% 41.2% 46.6% 51.7% 52.1% 45.3%
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% 2013 37/41 1.5 4.6 63.1% 62.1% 45.1% 51.8% 54.8% 55.9% 44.0%
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% 2014 45/46 2.3 4.6 60.9% 62.5% 41.5% 46.4% 38.7% 54.1% 41.5%
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% 2015 25/38 1.8 4.0 64.7% 59.1% 43.8% 47.5% 51.8% 53.4% 41.9%
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2016 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 44.4% 24.4% 33.9% 16.7% 36.6% 32.7%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2018 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.2% 48.8% 36.0% 33.3% 66.7% 44.1% 34.9%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 199/222 1.8 4.0 63.7% 59.7% 41.9% 47.9% 46.9% 53.2% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 2010 1531 114.5 -2.51 -1.59 0.841 46.2% +13 -17 — 32.5% -1.22 3–1 (75%) — — -0.04
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2011 1547 128.9 -1.89 -0.36 0.921 48.2% +6 -18 +15 37.1% -1.03 4–7 (36%) 4–7 (36%) 97.3 -1.36
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 2012 1618 120.6 -2.69 +0.80 0.946 48.6% +12 -75 -38 45.3% -0.29 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 103.0 +0.73
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 2013 1726 131.6 +0.33 +0.31 0.998 50.1% +11 -145 -164 55.2% +0.22 7–7 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.10
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05 2014 1614 113.7 -1.74 -2.06 0.905 47.9% +21 -83 -23 40.0% -0.72 14–4 (78%) 2–6 (25%) 105.8 +0.57
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 2015 1620 111.9 -3.72 +0.36 0.900 47.8% +1 -82 -66 39.1% -0.66 11–2 (85%) 3–7 (30%) 107.3 -0.12
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2016 1555 84.5 -4.79 -2.24 0.516 35.1% -2 — — 0.0% -4.88 — — — -0.31
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54 2018 1518 94.6 +0.08 -0.64 0.624 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61 — 1736 122.2 -1.90 -0.49 0.912 48.0% +11 -76 -64 41.6% -0.64 46–25 (65%) 18–26 (41%) 107.3 -0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.