H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 1-0

Shuai Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Chanelle Scheepers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Zhang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2010 Guangzhou Open second round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Chanelle Scheepers
RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Zhang #101 6-1 6-0 Chanelle Scheepers #93 Match data Sep 17, 2010* R16 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,724 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Chanelle Scheepers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,657 0 1
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,678 0 1
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,571 0 1
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,619 0 1
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,569 0 1
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Chanelle Scheepers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 13 18 27.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — — — — — 49 66 115 42.6% 34 33 67 50.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 176/193 of Chanelle Scheepers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Chanelle Scheepers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2008 2/2 1.0 2.5 61.9% 56.5% 23.0% 58.3% 18.2% 44.2% 34.1%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% 2009 12/12 1.3 3.5 65.7% 55.7% 41.8% 51.0% 48.2% 50.9% 38.0%
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2010 13/16 0.4 5.2 65.2% 58.3% 43.7% 55.9% 45.4% 52.9% 44.2%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% 2011 36/39 1.0 4.5 64.1% 59.3% 42.3% 50.1% 45.2% 53.1% 45.2%
28 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3% 2012 48/50 0.6 5.3 61.5% 58.4% 43.7% 46.8% 50.2% 52.6% 46.1%
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% 2013 30/36 0.9 4.9 60.7% 57.6% 43.3% 51.2% 43.5% 51.8% 45.5%
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% 2014 29/32 0.7 5.1 65.3% 56.8% 42.1% 48.3% 46.3% 51.4% 46.6%
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% 2015 6/6 0.3 6.3 66.0% 57.3% 46.6% 57.3% 39.4% 53.3% 41.4%
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 176/195 0.8 4.9 63.2% 57.9% 42.8% 49.9% 46.1% 52.2% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Chanelle Scheepers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2003 1504 97.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.16
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2008 1485 92.0 +0.92 -0.21 0.610 39.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — +0.01
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61 2009 1485 101.3 -2.96 -2.55 0.773 44.9% +7 — — 36.7% -1.33 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +0.02
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54 2010 1523 115.7 -1.51 +0.20 0.939 48.8% -20 +53 — 43.2% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +1.11
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50 2011 1657 122.4 -2.12 +1.22 0.962 49.0% +14 -94 — 47.9% -0.13 11–5 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.7 +1.86
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05 2012 1678 136.9 -2.13 +2.84 0.974 49.4% +14 -66 -142 48.7% -0.06 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 -0.91
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55 2013 1572 114.1 -3.06 +0.92 0.945 48.7% -12 +86 — 41.5% -0.54 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.8 +0.76
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27 2014 1620 124.9 -2.98 +1.97 0.959 49.1% -94 +102 — 46.1% -0.13 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 101.7 -0.75
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07 2015 1569 103.8 -0.95 -0.07 0.887 47.5% -79 +117 — 31.3% -1.56 1–3 (25%) — — -0.20
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61 — 1725 125.1 -2.36 +1.34 0.940 48.6% -7 +36 -142 44.5% -0.37 37–33 (53%) 18–23 (44%) 100.4 +1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.