H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 0-1

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2014 Canadian Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #51 6-2 6-4 Shuai Zhang #30 Match data Aug 6, 2014* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.8 -0.77 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.