H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 0-3
Irina-Camelia Begu holds a 3–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Irina-Camelia Begu leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2022 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2022* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-3 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| May 31, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-3 6-4 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| May 7, 2014* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-4 7-5 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Irina-Camelia Begu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |