H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Johanna Larsson
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Shuai Zhang vs Johanna Larsson.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |