H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Nao Hibino H2H: 1-0
Shuai Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Zhang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2018 Hiroshima fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-4 7-6(4) | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |