H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Petra Martic H2H: 2-1
Shuai Zhang holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shuai Zhang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2023 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-3 6-3 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2022* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 7-5 6-2 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Petra Martic | 6-2 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Petra Martic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |