H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Shahar Peer H2H: 1-0

Shuai Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Zhang leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shuai Zhang won the 2014 Birmingham round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Zhang #36 6-3 3-6 6-2 Shahar Peer #86 Match data Jun 12, 2014* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Shahar Peer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — — — — — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 370/469 of Shahar Peer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Shahar Peer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8%
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0%
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4%
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1%
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1%
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9%
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7%
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1%
28 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3% 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1%
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Shahar Peer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61 — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.