H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Stefanie Voegele vs Na Li H2H: 0-1

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Na Li won the 2009 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefanie Voegele
Switzerland Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #20 6-3 7-6(3) Stefanie Voegele #99 Match data Jun 13, 2009* QF Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,700 100 173 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefanie Voegele Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,498 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,664 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,544 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,510 0 0 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2016 10–14 41.7% #114 1,517 0 0 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,594 0 0 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2019 6–15 28.6% #119 1,594 0 0 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,602 0 0 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,537 0 0 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,497 0 0 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefanie Voegele Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 13 13 26 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2017 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2019 4 10 14 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2022 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 66 106 172 38.4% 29 48 77 37.7% 4 17 21 19.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 262/273 of Stefanie Voegele's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefanie Voegele Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 5.0 60.0% 55.1% 33.6% 16.3% 35.9% 46.4% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 19/19 2.7 3.2 55.6% 66.8% 41.1% 47.3% 48.0% 55.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 30/31 2.8 2.4 56.1% 60.6% 44.0% 42.9% 45.1% 53.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 3.5 2.5 58.4% 56.9% 43.4% 50.0% 34.7% 51.7% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 8/9 2.5 4.1 53.6% 59.9% 42.3% 48.9% 33.7% 51.9% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 40/41 3.5 2.7 54.9% 66.3% 46.8% 48.5% 40.8% 57.6% 41.9% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2014 36/37 4.4 1.9 56.4% 64.9% 42.8% 47.4% 49.5% 55.2% 42.3% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2015 17/24 3.1 2.3 60.4% 60.0% 45.8% 54.8% 47.5% 54.2% 37.1% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2016 24/24 2.6 1.8 56.8% 61.1% 42.5% 48.6% 43.8% 53.2% 42.7% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2017 9/9 3.9 3.0 55.5% 63.6% 42.5% 53.3% 44.0% 54.3% 42.0% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2018 26/26 3.3 1.9 56.8% 64.0% 47.0% 49.9% 36.3% 56.4% 38.5% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2019 21/21 2.2 2.8 56.8% 62.3% 40.6% 44.6% 46.9% 53.0% 41.5% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2020 6/6 2.0 3.0 53.4% 63.9% 39.8% 43.6% 31.9% 52.8% 40.3% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2021 16/16 2.4 2.8 56.4% 59.0% 42.2% 53.8% 40.4% 51.7% 40.3% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 2022 6/6 0.8 3.7 51.6% 51.5% 31.0% 44.0% 48.0% 42.1% 40.6% 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 262/273 3.0 2.5 56.2% 62.8% 43.4% 47.9% 43.5% 54.3% 41.4% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefanie Voegele Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2008 1486 102.6 +0.81 +2.45 0.828 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — -0.30 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2009 1559 110.5 -1.00 -0.45 0.970 48.9% -15 — +110 44.4% -0.20 7–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 107.0 +1.19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2010 1504 114.4 -2.38 -0.92 0.908 47.8% +41 -52 — 37.7% -0.88 1–8 (11%) 4–5 (44%) 92.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1518 101.1 -0.37 -0.64 0.842 46.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1498 112.2 -1.83 -0.15 0.870 46.8% -12 +15 — 31.8% -1.23 1–3 (25%) — — -0.33 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2013 1665 132.8 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.8% -31 -48 -123 46.9% -0.05 14–4 (78%) 5–8 (38%) 112.4 -0.72 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2014 1544 116.4 -1.15 -1.36 0.944 48.6% +18 +54 — 43.7% -0.69 3–12 (20%) 6–6 (50%) 91.8 +0.91 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2015 1511 109.4 -3.15 -3.22 0.811 46.1% +55 +2 — 30.2% -1.26 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.11 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2016 1517 103.6 -2.18 -1.45 0.912 48.0% +27 +22 -70 42.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +1.52 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2017 1651 123.2 -0.54 +0.06 0.918 48.3% +32 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 1–0 — +0.12 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2018 1594 119.0 +0.12 -3.10 0.884 47.4% +36 -67 -143 39.3% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 -1.04 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2019 1594 116.8 -2.79 -1.89 0.882 47.2% +41 -76 — 34.8% -1.02 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 -0.08 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2020 1602 112.7 -0.73 -1.09 0.854 46.6% +29 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 1–1 — +0.01 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2021 1538 111.9 -2.04 -1.43 0.834 46.0% +15 -4 — 28.9% -1.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 2022 1498 106.8 -4.32 -2.01 0.701 41.9% +78 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 — — +0.47 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1700 120.1 -1.29 -1.46 0.904 47.8% +20 -14 -33 39.1% -0.79 41–51 (45%) 24–37 (39%) 96.3 +0.64 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.