H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-2

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 2–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Miami Open second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #27 6-2 7-5 Alison Riske-Amritraj #45 Match data Mar 22, 2019* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #89 6-2 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #72 Match data Jun 10, 2016* R16 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Alison Riske-Amritraj #97 3-6 7-5 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #93 Match data Jan 8, 2016* R16 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7%
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2%
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.