H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-4

Lucie Safarova holds a 4–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Strasbourg Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #49 6-2 6-3 Lucie Safarova #54 Match data May 24, 2018* R16 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lucie Safarova #44 1-6 6-3 7-6(7) Su-Wei Hsieh #116 Match data Jun 16, 2017* R16 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lucie Safarova #47 6-2 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #102 Match data Feb 24, 2017* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Safarova #16 7-6(3) 7-5 Su-Wei Hsieh #78 Match data Apr 29, 2016* QF Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lucie Safarova #6 6-2 6-3 Su-Wei Hsieh #131 Match data Jul 2, 2015* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Lucie Safarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — — — — — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Lucie Safarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4%
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Lucie Safarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.78
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.14
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.99
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.17
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.32
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.46
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.94
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.27
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.40 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.73
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.23 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) — -2.02
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) — -0.85
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.56
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.11 2017 1797 139.6 +4.57 -0.46 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.88
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.05 +0.79 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.19 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -1.01
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.42 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.