H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-4

Lucie Safarova holds a 4–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Strasbourg fourth round 6-2 6-3.

TPE Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2018* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Su-Wei Hsieh #49 6-2 6-3 Lucie Safarova #54 Match data
Jun 16, 2017* Nottingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Lucie Safarova #44 1-6 6-3 7-6(7) Su-Wei Hsieh #116 Match data
Feb 24, 2017* Budapest WTA 250 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #47 6-2 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #102 Match data
Apr 29, 2016* Prague WTA 250 QF Clay Lucie Safarova #16 7-6(3) 7-5 Su-Wei Hsieh #78 Match data
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lucie Safarova #6 6-2 6-3 Su-Wei Hsieh #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,874 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,549 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,541 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,474 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,455 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,460 0 0 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2012 22–13 62.9% #25 1,689 0 2 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,558 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,545 0 2 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,583 0 2 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,588 0 2 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2018 30–16 65.2% #28 1,768 0 3
33 2019 30–23 56.6% #32 1,777 0 3
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,703 0 3
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3