H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-0

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2021 Chicago 1 third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
TPE Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2021* Chicago 1 WTA 250 R32 Hard Su-Wei Hsieh #81 6-2 6-3 Venus Williams #147 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,874 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,549 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,541 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,474 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,455 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,460 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2012 22–13 62.9% #25 1,689 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,558 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,545 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,583 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,588 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2018 30–16 65.2% #28 1,768 0 3 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2019 30–23 56.6% #32 1,777 0 3 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,703 0 3 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47