H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 5-2

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 5–2 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Maria Kirilenko leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2014 Rome second round 7-5 6-0.

RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 7-5 6-0 Maria Kirilenko #41 Match data
Feb 16, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #18 6-4 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #13 6-3 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
May 29, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Maria Kirilenko #30 6-3 2-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 Match data
May 6, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Maria Kirilenko #37 6-2 3-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 Match data
Jan 20, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-1 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #28 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 4-6 6-3 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18