H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Na Li H2H: 6-3

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 6–3 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2011 Sydney quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3.

RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2011* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Na Li #11 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #25 Match data
Apr 30, 2010* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Na Li #16 6-3 7-5 Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 Match data
May 1, 2009* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 4-6 6-4 7-5 Na Li #30 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 6-4 7-5 Na Li #29 Match data
Sep 18, 2008* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 6-2 1-6 6-3 Na Li #31 Match data
Sep 23, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-4 4-6 6-4 Na Li #23 Match data
Jul 1, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Na Li #30 3-6 6-2 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 Match data
Jun 3, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-3 7-6(4) Na Li #38 Match data
Sep 24, 2004* Beijing WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3) Na Li #193 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18