H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-2

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 3–2 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2013 Carlsbad third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2013* Carlsbad WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #131 6-2 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Virginie Razzano #118 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 Match data
May 7, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #38 6-1 6-1 Virginie Razzano #54 Match data
Oct 3, 2002* Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #45 7-5 6-2 Virginie Razzano #99 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Bali WTA 250 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #59 7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 Virginie Razzano #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —