H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Tamara Korpatsch vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 1-1
Tamara Korpatsch and Anna Karolina Schmiedlova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova won the 2023 Budapest fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
| May 2, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Tamara Korpatsch | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | #75 | #71 | 951 | 1,731 | 46 | 72 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Korpatsch | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #164 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #117 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #74 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |