H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2019 Charleston Open first round 1-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-3 6-4 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | May 24, 2026* | Q2 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Tamara Zidansek | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data | Apr 3, 2019* | R64 | Charleston Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #146 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,803 | 80 | 91 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #253 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,743 | 62 | 83 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #146 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 34 | 51 | 85 | 40.0% | 42 | 33 | 75 | 56.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 36 | 43 | 79 | 45.6% | 18 | 28 | 46 | 39.1% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's and 128/144 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 68.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 49.2% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 65.4% | 57.7% | 42.3% | 44.7% | 51.2% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 2014 | 17/17 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 59.9% | 64.7% | 46.0% | 49.9% | 55.8% | 56.9% | 42.6% |
| 21 | 2019 | 33/34 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 42.8% | 2015 | 13/25 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 62.7% | 64.0% | 48.7% | 45.1% | 40.6% | 58.1% | 40.1% |
| 22 | 2020 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 59.5% | 47.5% | 55.0% | 48.5% | 55.6% | 43.3% | 2016 | 29/29 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 66.8% | 48.7% | 55.2% | 47.6% | 60.2% | 38.8% |
| 23 | 2021 | 41/43 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 45.6% | 49.4% | 50.9% | 56.7% | 45.0% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 66.2% | 51.0% | 50.0% | 61.5% | 66.7% | 50.6% | 39.1% |
| 24 | 2022 | 30/32 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 61.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 48.5% | 54.3% | 41.4% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 67.6% | 52.3% | 49.5% | 65.9% | 60.0% | 52.0% | 37.7% |
| 25 | 2023 | 14/14 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 68.0% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 54.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 2019 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 67.0% | 62.6% | 46.2% | 56.0% | 50.1% | 56.9% | 39.8% |
| 26 | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 57.8% | 38.8% | 46.4% | 36.2% | 51.2% | 40.2% | 2020 | 9/9 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 67.9% | 51.0% | 45.4% | 37.7% | 62.7% | 43.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14/16 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 64.3% | 63.5% | 43.8% | 55.2% | 37.7% | 56.5% | 39.4% |
| 28 | 2026 | 6/7 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 59.6% | 64.0% | 44.6% | 51.1% | 61.9% | 55.8% | 47.8% | 2022 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 66.0% | 62.0% | 45.6% | 57.1% | 64.1% | 56.3% | 41.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 21/21 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 66.8% | 62.2% | 45.3% | 54.4% | 54.5% | 56.6% | 42.0% |
| Career | — | 164/171 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 59.9% | 43.7% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 54.2% | 43.9% | — | 128/145 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 64.8% | 64.0% | 47.0% | 53.1% | 48.7% | 57.9% | 40.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1484 | 98.5 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.766 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.1 | -1.96 | +2.38 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -117 | +98 | — | 55.2% | +0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 | 2014 | 1539 | 113.8 | +0.51 | -1.51 | 0.986 | 49.8% | +15 | 0 | — | 43.9% | -0.29 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.5 | -0.25 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1642 | 115.3 | -2.75 | -0.57 | 0.912 | 48.3% | -135 | +147 | -8 | 43.4% | -0.60 | 9–8 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.4 | -0.17 | 2015 | 1583 | 117.4 | -0.11 | -1.37 | 0.957 | 49.5% | +1 | -45 | — | 45.6% | -0.30 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–3 (0%) | 100.4 | +0.50 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1613 | 128.8 | -0.74 | +0.40 | 0.974 | 49.8% | -65 | +134 | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.1 | -0.44 | 2016 | 1646 | 122.7 | +3.29 | -3.20 | 0.976 | 49.4% | -4 | -78 | -8 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.2 | -0.35 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1727 | 132.9 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -162 | +227 | — | 54.1% | +0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.2 | +0.90 | 2017 | 1602 | 95.5 | -1.10 | -1.20 | 0.792 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1596 | 120.1 | -1.76 | -0.99 | 0.907 | 47.9% | +16 | +119 | -18 | 41.7% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.49 | 2018 | 1596 | 106.9 | +0.57 | +0.53 | 0.785 | 45.3% | -6 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.15 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1678 | 119.9 | -2.90 | +0.63 | 0.942 | 48.6% | -80 | +129 | — | 48.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | -0.10 | 2019 | 1658 | 119.7 | +0.76 | -1.59 | 0.922 | 48.6% | -69 | +3 | -16 | 50.0% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -1.03 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1638 | 109.0 | -2.73 | -2.13 | 0.825 | 45.6% | -61 | +156 | — | 36.0% | -1.32 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | +0.29 | 2020 | 1647 | 124.1 | +2.54 | -0.84 | 1.162 | 51.8% | -15 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1593 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2021 | 1566 | 109.4 | -0.41 | -3.05 | 0.906 | 48.0% | +7 | +39 | — | 34.2% | -0.76 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.82 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1696 | 113.2 | -0.32 | +0.56 | 1.081 | 51.7% | -12 | +34 | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.34 | 2022 | 1691 | 113.4 | -0.02 | -1.40 | 0.944 | 49.3% | -36 | — | — | 47.4% | -0.58 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | -0.07 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1606 | 124.0 | -0.63 | -1.56 | 0.967 | 49.4% | +15 | +85 | — | 41.2% | -0.39 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–6 (14%) | 88.8 | -0.94 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1545 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1653 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1557 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1804 | 125.4 | -1.42 | +0.07 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -86 | +153 | -14 | 46.9% | -0.34 | 33–32 (51%) | 27–16 (63%) | 106.1 | +0.86 | — | 1743 | 121.9 | +0.93 | -1.96 | 0.963 | 49.2% | -2 | -4 | -11 | 44.4% | -0.36 | 26–28 (48%) | 15–22 (41%) | 98.5 | -0.75 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Martic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 25, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 7, 2020 | H2H |
| Margarita Gasparyan | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Kiki Bertens | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 2019 | H2H |