H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 1-0
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2022 Madrid second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 6-2 6-3 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |