H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Giulia Gatto-Monticone H2H: 1-0
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Giulia Gatto-Monticone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2021 Bogota fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 6-2 6-3 | Giulia Gatto-Monticone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Giulia Gatto-Monticone | #1,081 | #148 | 437 | 1,573 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Giulia Gatto-Monticone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #247 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #188 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |