H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 1-3
Yulia Putintseva holds a 3–1 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2019 Zhengzhou third round 6-1 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2019* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| May 26, 2019* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| May 25, 2019 | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| May 2, 2019* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 91 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |