H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Taylor Townsend vs Ysaline Bonaventure H2H: 1-1
Taylor Townsend and Ysaline Bonaventure are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Taylor Townsend leads 1–0 on clay, while Ysaline Bonaventure leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Townsend won the 2023 Rome first round 4-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 31
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Taylor Townsend | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Ysaline Bonaventure | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ysaline Bonaventure | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ysaline Bonaventure | #939 | #81 | 746 | 1,711 | 28 | 50 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Townsend | Ysaline Bonaventure | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #229 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #117 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #235 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #189 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |