H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 1-3
Anett Kontaveit holds a 3–1 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tereza Martincova won the 2022 Ostrava fourth round 7-6(3) 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 7-6(3) 1-0 (ret.) | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2022* | Tallinn | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-2 6-1 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2022* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2017* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 6-1 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |