H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Reka Luca Jani H2H: 1-1
Tereza Martincova and Reka Luca Jani are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Reka Luca Jani leads 1–0 on clay, while Tereza Martincova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Reka Luca Jani won the 2021 Belgrade third round 6-2 0-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 34
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2021* | Belgrade | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Reka Luca Jani | 6-2 0-6 7-5 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2016* | Florianopolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 6-3 6-2 | Reka Luca Jani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reka Luca Jani | #1,323 | #104 | 626 | 1,552 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Reka Luca Jani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #305 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #343 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |