H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Timea Bacsinszky vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-2

Shahar Peer holds a 2–0 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2010 China Open quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #18 7-6(4) 6-4 Timea Bacsinszky #47 Match data Oct 8, 2010* QF China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shahar Peer #19 5-7 7-5 6-4 Timea Bacsinszky #48 Match data Sep 28, 2010* R64 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0
18 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0
19 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3
20 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3
21 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3
22 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5
24 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5
25 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5
26 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5
27 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5
29 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Shahar Peer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
27 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's and 370/469 of Shahar Peer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Shahar Peer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3% 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8%
19 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2% 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0%
20 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3% 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4%
21 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1%
22 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0% 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1%
23 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9% 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9%
24 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9% 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9%
25 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1% 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7%
26 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9% 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5%
27 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8% 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1%
28 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6% 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1%
29 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1% — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Shahar Peer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42
18 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40
19 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31
20 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52
21 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00
22 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03
23 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29
24 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40
25 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53
26 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54
27 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24
28 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28
29 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96 — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.