H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-0
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2008 US Open second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-3 6-2 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Timea Bacsinszky | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |