H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Zi Yan H2H: 1-0
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2008 Strasbourg fourth round 6-2 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2008* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Zi Yan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Timea Bacsinszky | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |