H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tsvetana Pironkova vs Katie Obrien H2H: 0-1
Katie Obrien holds a 1–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katie Obrien leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katie Obrien won the 2008 Portoroz third round 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2008* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katie Obrien | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tsvetana Pironkova | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |