H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Vania King vs Mara Santangelo H2H: 0-2
Mara Santangelo holds a 2–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mara Santangelo leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mara Santangelo won the 2006 Bangalore semifinal 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2006* | Bangalore | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Mara Santangelo | 5-0 (ret.) | Vania King | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2006* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mara Santangelo | 6-3 6-1 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vania King | Mara Santangelo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |