H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 2-6

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 6–2 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 5–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Australian Open third round 6-0 7-5.

USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #6 6-0 7-5 Varvara Lepchenko #30 Match data
Sep 20, 2014* Seoul WTA 250 QF Hard Varvara Lepchenko #43 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 Agnieszka Radwanska #5 Match data
Aug 1, 2014* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #59 6-3 3-6 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #5 Match data
Aug 15, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-4 6-0 Varvara Lepchenko #40 Match data
Jul 27, 2013* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 Varvara Lepchenko #40 Match data
May 12, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-4 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #77 Match data
Feb 17, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #6 7-5 6-1 Varvara Lepchenko #114 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #59 5-7 6-3 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0