H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Varvara Lepchenko vs Julia Goerges H2H: 3-0
Varvara Lepchenko holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Luxembourg third round 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| May 9, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Varvara Lepchenko | (w/o) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2012* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Varvara Lepchenko | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |