H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 0-5

Kaia Kanepi holds a 5–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2018 Cincinnati second round 2-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2018* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #46 2-6 6-3 6-1 Varvara Lepchenko #120 Match data
Mar 25, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #51 6-2 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #31 Match data
Feb 12, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #27 6-3 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #51 Match data
May 25, 2013* Brussels WTA 500 QF Clay Kaia Kanepi #40 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) Varvara Lepchenko #29 Match data
Sep 22, 2012* Seoul WTA 250 SF Hard Kaia Kanepi #16 6-4 2-6 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —