H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Na Li H2H: 0-1

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Miami Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

United States Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #5 6-2 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #29 Match data Mar 21, 2013* R32 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #183 #19 1,875 1,803 156 221 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Na Li — #2 7,585 2,117 339 160 67.9% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,509 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,443 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,442 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,452 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,467 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,507 0 0 2007 23–13 63.9% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2012 25–20 55.6% #21 1,712 0 0 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,862 0 2
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,606 0 0 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,753 0 0 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,850 0 3
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,637 0 0 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,608 0 0 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 2,000 1 6
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,705 0 0 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,631 0 0 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9
33 2019 2–10 16.7% #173 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–4 33.3% #183 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 14 6 20 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2012 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 7 17 24 29.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2014 20 12 32 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2016 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 132 227 41.9% 50 63 113 44.2% 11 25 36 30.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 223 105 328 68.0% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 344/373 of Varvara Lepchenko's and 372/487 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 6/8 0.8 4.0 64.2% 50.1% 45.8% 48.2% 45.8% 49.2% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 11/12 1.6 3.0 70.2% 56.8% 37.3% 52.7% 47.3% 50.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 3/6 1.3 2.0 63.0% 53.9% 56.6% 58.3% 16.7% 55.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 15/17 1.2 2.5 70.0% 59.4% 49.2% 53.3% 49.4% 55.7% 41.6% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2010 13/14 2.8 2.8 63.9% 59.9% 45.7% 44.4% 44.4% 54.9% 41.7% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2011 17/18 2.0 3.6 66.2% 56.3% 43.0% 48.5% 48.8% 51.6% 43.0% 2007 33/36 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2012 42/45 2.6 3.0 63.3% 63.2% 48.3% 51.9% 50.2% 57.7% 41.5% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2013 37/41 2.0 3.3 65.0% 60.6% 45.5% 49.4% 42.0% 55.3% 42.4% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2014 43/46 1.9 2.9 67.1% 62.3% 47.9% 56.8% 47.8% 57.6% 44.8% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2015 31/39 2.2 2.8 69.3% 59.5% 51.1% 44.3% 43.0% 56.4% 40.3% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2016 32/32 2.6 2.9 64.5% 63.3% 45.7% 55.2% 43.4% 57.0% 42.0% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2017 38/38 2.1 2.4 69.9% 60.4% 48.5% 47.0% 50.2% 56.9% 40.2% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 2018 19/19 1.6 2.6 68.0% 58.5% 44.8% 56.1% 42.6% 53.9% 40.4% 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
33 2019 12/12 1.2 2.6 63.6% 58.2% 37.6% 50.1% 46.0% 50.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2/2 1.5 2.5 68.2% 52.0% 36.3% 51.9% 51.1% 47.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 8/8 1.9 2.0 66.5% 59.2% 44.8% 56.7% 35.9% 54.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 8/8 2.3 1.1 64.8% 61.3% 57.4% 54.5% 30.5% 59.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1/2 1.0 1.0 77.8% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% 59.7% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 6/6 1.7 3.3 61.8% 66.4% 42.6% 48.7% 40.7% 57.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344/377 2.0 2.8 66.4% 60.5% 46.7% 51.2% 45.4% 55.7% 41.3% — 372/499 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1482 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2005 1510 108.8 — — — — +23 — — 71.4% +1.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.39 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2006 1491 104.2 -2.19 -2.82 0.768 44.5% +4 — — 30.0% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1444 105.8 -3.00 -3.30 0.753 44.4% +8 +90 — 27.6% -1.72 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1442 99.7 -0.21 -4.92 0.705 44.7% +17 +65 — 33.3% -1.08 — — — +0.44 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2009 1452 112.8 +0.34 -2.03 0.939 48.7% -45 +83 — 37.5% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -0.02 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2010 1468 112.6 -1.47 -1.40 0.925 48.1% -82 +77 — 41.9% -0.77 0–5 (0%) 2–0 — +0.16 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2011 1508 110.7 -2.49 +0.09 0.889 47.1% -91 +44 — 36.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.4 -0.37 2007 1815 149.5 +2.69 +1.93 1.133 52.7% +68 -32 -42 62.1% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 3–1 (75%) 100.7 +1.06
26 2012 1712 134.1 +1.37 -1.53 0.982 49.5% -98 -36 -106 55.4% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 109.2 +1.10 2008 1863 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -126 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.3 -1.78
27 2013 1607 133.5 -0.39 -0.95 0.948 48.8% -50 +122 — 43.2% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 6–5 (55%) 100.0 +0.01 2009 1939 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +48 -153 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.5 -2.23
28 2014 1754 139.8 +1.35 +1.85 1.057 51.0% -27 -11 -173 55.0% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 105.6 +0.56 2010 1850 150.6 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -22 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.94
29 2015 1638 128.4 -0.98 -0.70 0.925 48.4% +63 -25 -124 44.7% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +1.03 2011 1863 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -58 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2016 1609 123.0 +0.49 -0.93 0.978 49.5% +29 +1 -113 46.1% -0.30 7–9 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.47 2012 2000 162.3 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2017 1706 124.1 +0.80 -2.00 0.932 48.5% -5 -69 -238 47.4% -0.55 8–11 (42%) 11–3 (79%) 103.5 -1.99 2013 2068 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +55 -127 -178 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 2018 1631 122.6 -1.36 -1.05 0.877 47.4% +16 -20 — 39.1% -1.02 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 -1.14 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -109 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
33 2019 1523 100.7 -2.66 -3.16 0.762 44.4% +1 -2 — 23.1% -1.85 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1483 108.6 -2.16 -1.70 0.843 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1583 103.2 -1.31 -3.66 0.835 46.7% +24 -127 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1611 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1639 109.6 +0.88 -1.47 1.034 48.3% +66 — — 31.3% -1.19 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1608 101.7 +0.55 +1.40 0.687 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 1516 108.3 -0.27 -2.20 0.959 49.1% — +64 — 37.5% -0.44 2–2 (50%) — — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 125.8 -0.15 -1.09 0.933 48.5% -14 +22 -156 43.8% -0.47 60–82 (42%) 58–52 (53%) 102.2 +0.11 — 2117 160.3 +4.01 +3.65 1.175 53.4% +13 -20 -66 65.1% +1.14 89–65 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.2 -1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.