H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-3

Samantha Stosur holds a 3–1 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2015 Brisbane third round 4-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2015* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #34 4-6 6-4 7-5 Samantha Stosur #21 Match data
Aug 13, 2014* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Samantha Stosur #22 6-2 7-5 Varvara Lepchenko #49 Match data
Aug 1, 2013* Carlsbad WTA 500 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #13 7-5 6-1 Varvara Lepchenko #37 Match data
Sep 2, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #7 7-6(5) 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 — — — — — — — 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —