H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 3-2

Varvara Lepchenko holds a 3–2 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Varvara Lepchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2016 Luxembourg third round 6-1 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Tsvetana Pironkova
BUL Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 2016* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #90 6-1 3-6 6-1 Tsvetana Pironkova #65 Match data
Jun 25, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Varvara Lepchenko #57 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 Tsvetana Pironkova #40 Match data
Jan 10, 2014* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Tsvetana Pironkova #107 6-3 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #52 Match data
Oct 18, 2012* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Tsvetana Pironkova #44 6-0 7-6(3) Varvara Lepchenko #21 Match data
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #19 7-5 6-4 Tsvetana Pironkova #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tsvetana Pironkova #1,170 #31 1,805 1,770 169 222 43.2% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Tsvetana Pironkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2005 6–3 66.7% #86 1,599 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 15–16 48.4% #64 1,662 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2007 7–15 31.8% #95 1,596 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2008 15–17 46.9% #44 1,631 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #97 1,546 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2010 16–15 51.6% #35 1,623 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2011 13–22 37.1% #46 1,644 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2012 19–23 45.2% #42 1,658 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2013 9–21 30.0% #108 1,561 0 0
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2014 17–19 47.2% #38 1,619 0 1
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2015 18–21 46.2% #59 1,633 0 1
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2016 10–12 45.5% #64 1,671 0 1
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2017 6–10 37.5% #165 1,639 0 1
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2020 6–2 75.0% #136 1,739 0 1
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2021 3–6 33.3% #252 1,706 0 1
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —