H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 0-3

Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2015 US Open fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 8, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #20 6-3 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #46 Match data
Jun 17, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Victoria Azarenka #25 7-6(7) 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #38 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Memphis WTA 250 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #14 6-2 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #125 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —