H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 0-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2010 Miami Open first round 6-3 5-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
United States Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #39 6-3 5-0 (ret.) Varvara Lepchenko #108 Match data Mar 25, 2010* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #181 #19 1,875 1,802 156 221 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,509 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,448 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,508 0 0 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2
26 2012 25–20 55.6% #21 1,712 0 0 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,606 0 0 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,753 0 0 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,637 0 0 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,608 0 0 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,705 0 0 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,631 0 0 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2
33 2019 2–10 16.7% #173 1,522 0 0 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–4 33.3% #181 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Virginie Razzano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2006 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2012 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 7 17 24 29.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2014 20 12 32 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 132 227 41.9% 50 63 113 44.2% 11 25 36 30.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 344/373 of Varvara Lepchenko's and 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Virginie Razzano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 6/8 0.8 4.0 64.2% 50.1% 45.8% 48.2% 45.8% 49.2% 39.0% 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3%
21 2007 11/12 1.6 3.0 70.2% 56.8% 37.3% 52.7% 47.3% 50.7% 37.1% 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7%
22 2008 3/6 1.3 2.0 63.0% 53.9% 56.6% 58.3% 16.7% 55.1% 31.7% 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0%
23 2009 15/17 1.2 2.5 70.0% 59.4% 49.2% 53.3% 49.4% 55.7% 41.6% 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7%
24 2010 13/14 2.8 2.8 63.9% 59.9% 45.7% 44.4% 44.4% 54.9% 41.7% 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1%
25 2011 17/18 2.0 3.6 66.2% 56.3% 43.0% 48.5% 48.8% 51.6% 43.0% 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0%
26 2012 42/45 2.6 3.0 63.3% 63.2% 48.3% 51.9% 50.2% 57.7% 41.5% 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8%
27 2013 37/41 2.0 3.3 65.0% 60.6% 45.5% 49.4% 42.0% 55.3% 42.4% 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9%
28 2014 43/46 1.9 2.9 67.1% 62.3% 47.9% 56.8% 47.8% 57.6% 44.8% 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5%
29 2015 31/39 2.2 2.8 69.3% 59.5% 51.1% 44.3% 43.0% 56.4% 40.3% 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7%
30 2016 32/32 2.6 2.9 64.5% 63.3% 45.7% 55.2% 43.4% 57.0% 42.0% 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1%
31 2017 38/38 2.1 2.4 69.9% 60.4% 48.5% 47.0% 50.2% 56.9% 40.2% 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7%
32 2018 19/19 1.6 2.6 68.0% 58.5% 44.8% 56.1% 42.6% 53.9% 40.4% 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5%
33 2019 12/12 1.2 2.6 63.6% 58.2% 37.6% 50.1% 46.0% 50.8% 37.5% 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0%
34 2020 2/2 1.5 2.5 68.2% 52.0% 36.3% 51.9% 51.1% 47.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 8/8 1.9 2.0 66.5% 59.2% 44.8% 56.7% 35.9% 54.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 8/8 2.3 1.1 64.8% 61.3% 57.4% 54.5% 30.5% 59.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1/2 1.0 1.0 77.8% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% 59.7% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 6/6 1.7 3.3 61.6% 67.3% 42.9% 49.5% 40.7% 57.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344/377 2.0 2.8 66.4% 60.5% 46.7% 51.3% 45.3% 55.7% 41.3% — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Virginie Razzano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1482 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70
19 2005 1510 108.8 — — — — +23 — — 71.4% +1.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.39 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19
20 2006 1491 104.2 -2.19 -2.82 0.768 44.5% +4 — — 30.0% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.12 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11
21 2007 1452 106.5 -3.00 -3.30 0.753 44.4% +14 +82 — 27.6% -1.72 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.51 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44
22 2008 1449 99.7 -0.21 -4.92 0.705 44.7% +22 +58 — 33.3% -1.08 — — — +0.44 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08
23 2009 1456 112.8 +0.34 -2.03 0.939 48.7% -40 +79 — 37.5% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.04 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
24 2010 1470 112.5 -1.47 -1.40 0.925 48.1% -77 +74 — 41.9% -0.77 0–5 (0%) 2–0 — +0.15 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70
25 2011 1509 110.7 -2.49 +0.09 0.889 47.1% -86 +42 — 36.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.3 -0.38 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98
26 2012 1712 134.0 +1.37 -1.53 0.982 49.5% -96 -36 -106 55.4% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 109.1 +1.09 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77
27 2013 1607 133.5 -0.39 -0.95 0.948 48.8% -50 +122 — 43.2% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 6–5 (55%) 100.0 +0.01 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13
28 2014 1754 139.8 +1.35 +1.85 1.057 51.0% -27 -11 -174 55.0% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 105.6 +0.56 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70
29 2015 1637 128.4 -0.98 -0.70 0.925 48.4% +64 -24 -123 44.7% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +1.03 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93
30 2016 1608 123.0 +0.49 -0.93 0.978 49.5% +29 +2 -112 46.1% -0.30 7–9 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.47 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32
31 2017 1706 124.1 +0.80 -2.00 0.932 48.5% -5 -69 -238 47.4% -0.55 8–11 (42%) 11–3 (79%) 103.5 -2.00 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40
32 2018 1631 122.6 -1.36 -1.05 0.877 47.4% +16 -20 — 39.1% -1.02 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 -1.14 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16
33 2019 1523 100.7 -2.66 -3.16 0.762 44.4% +1 -2 — 23.1% -1.85 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64
34 2020 1483 108.5 -2.16 -1.70 0.843 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.09 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1583 103.2 -1.31 -3.66 0.835 46.7% +24 -127 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.34 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1611 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1639 109.6 +0.88 -1.47 1.034 48.3% +66 — — 31.3% -1.19 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1606 101.7 +0.56 +1.40 0.687 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 1515 108.8 -0.01 -2.17 0.973 49.3% — +67 — 37.5% -0.44 2–2 (50%) — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 126.0 -0.15 -1.09 0.934 48.5% -13 +21 -156 43.8% -0.47 60–82 (42%) 58–52 (53%) 102.1 +0.09 — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.