H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1

Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 Mallorca second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ana Konjuh
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ana Konjuh #28 6-1 6-3 Victoria Azarenka Match data Jun 23, 2017* R16 Mallorca International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Ana Konjuh #647 #20 1,830 1,786 84 81 50.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ana Konjuh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2014 8–6 57.1% #93 1,611 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 2015 11–9 55.0% #82 1,656 0 1
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2016 19–14 57.6% #47 1,683 0 1
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2017 22–18 55.0% #44 1,716 0 1
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2018 1–3 25.0% #385 1,688 0 1
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2019 0–1 0.0% #1282 1,645 0 1
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 — — — — — — —
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2021 17–14 54.8% #67 1,690 0 1
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2022 6–13 31.6% #108 1,647 0 1
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2023 0–2 0.0% #407 1,587 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 — — — — — — —
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,464 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 — — — — — — —
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 — — — — — — —
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 — — — — — — —
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ana Konjuh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 12 7 19 63.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2021 9 8 17 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 49 49 98 50.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ana Konjuh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% 2014 14/14 5.4 5.8 53.2% 68.0% 43.3% 47.2% 39.0% 56.7% 40.4%
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% 2015 17/20 3.2 3.8 58.4% 65.2% 50.4% 56.8% 59.7% 58.7% 44.3%
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2016 28/33 3.9 5.1 53.6% 70.2% 45.2% 57.5% 47.1% 58.3% 43.6%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2017 40/40 3.6 4.7 57.7% 67.7% 44.6% 52.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2018 4/4 3.8 3.0 62.5% 57.0% 35.7% 58.3% 24.2% 48.3% 40.7%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2019 1/1 3.0 8.0 42.6% 76.9% 42.9% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 27.9%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2021 31/31 3.9 7.4 59.0% 62.8% 42.4% 54.1% 48.3% 54.4% 44.9%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2022 18/19 4.5 5.7 57.5% 64.9% 39.5% 51.1% 36.4% 53.9% 39.7%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2023 2/2 4.0 5.5 54.5% 67.3% 41.9% 67.7% 14.3% 55.7% 29.4%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2025 1/1 0.0 8.0 42.6% 60.9% 48.4% 42.9% 33.3% 53.7% 36.4%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 156/165 3.9 5.4 56.8% 66.3% 43.9% 53.7% 46.7% 56.5% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ana Konjuh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 2014 1611 123.8 +0.22 -1.66 0.933 48.3% -10 — +44 47.4% -0.24 8–2 (80%) 1–1 — -0.76
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2015 1657 117.4 +0.42 +1.27 1.073 51.6% -67 -102 +82 52.3% +0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.20
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 2016 1684 123.8 +2.55 +0.13 1.047 51.1% +5 -132 -1 58.0% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +1.16
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2017 1716 135.7 +1.25 +0.51 1.028 50.5% -10 -157 +78 54.1% +0.13 9–6 (60%) 8–5 (62%) 104.6 -0.34
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2018 1688 106.6 -1.09 +0.29 0.789 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2019 1646 96.7 -2.44 -2.78 0.654 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2020 1622 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2021 1691 127.3 -0.62 +0.89 0.985 49.7% +1 -22 — 52.8% +0.03 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 -0.51
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2022 1647 126.6 -1.90 -1.85 0.861 46.8% +43 -54 — 36.4% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -1.32
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2023 1587 109.7 -2.35 -4.08 0.664 42.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2024 1554 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2025 1465 98.2 +2.05 -0.61 0.785 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2026 1446 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 1786 128.7 +0.44 +0.04 0.982 49.6% -3 -88 +62 50.3% -0.09 35–23 (60%) 21–15 (58%) 109.5 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.